The 5 Stories We Tell Ourselves in a Crisis — and What to Do Instead
The email lands on a Tuesday afternoon. A reorg. A key client walking. A market shift that rewrites the rules overnight. Maybe it's not even that dramatic — maybe it's just the slow accumulation of uncertainty that's been building for months, and today something tips.
Before you've finished reading, your brain is already working. Not on solutions. On a story. One that makes sense of what just happened, fast. One that feels true.
That's the part worth paying attention to.
Why Our Brains Default to Story
We like to think we respond to facts. In reality, we respond to our interpretation of facts, and in a crisis, that interpretation happens fast.
When uncertainty spikes, the amygdala fires before the prefrontal cortex has had a chance to weigh in. The result is a narrative that prioritizes speed over accuracy. It's not a flaw. It's ancient wiring designed to keep you alive in a world of predators and resource scarcity.
The VUCA world doesn't require fight-or-flight. It requires nuance. A brain running on survival narratives in a complex, ambiguous environment will consistently mistake the story for the truth.
The first step to changing that? Knowing which stories you're most likely to tell.
The 5 Stories
Story 1: "This is just temporary."
Of all five narratives, this one is the most socially acceptable. It sounds like optimism. It often gets praised as resilience. And in fairness, sometimes things really are temporary.
This story becomes a trap when it functions as a way to avoid adapting. Psychologists call it normalcy bias — the brain's strong preference for familiar patterns, which leads us to underestimate both the likelihood and the impact of disruption. We assume the situation will resolve into something recognizable because that's what situations have always done.
In a VUCA world, that assumption is increasingly unreliable. Markets don't always correct back. Organizational structures don't always return to what felt comfortable. Waiting for "normal" can mean missing the window to build something better suited to what's actually in front of you.
The reframe: "This may not be temporary. What would I do differently if I accepted that?" Not catastrophizing. Honest assessment. The answer might surprise you.
Story 2: "I have no control over any of this."
When the ground shifts, the brain scans urgently for agency. It wants to know what you can act on. When the situation is genuinely complex, that scan can come back empty.
Psychologist Martin Seligman's research on learned helplessness demonstrated that when people repeatedly experience situations where their actions seem to have no effect, they eventually stop trying — even when circumstances change and action would work. (Seligman & Maier, 1967, Journal of Experimental Psychology.) In a crisis, the leap from "I can't control this specific thing" to "I can't control anything" can happen faster than we realize.
What gets lost in that leap is the circle of influence — the space where your choices and your responses still matter, even when the broader situation doesn't budge.
The reframe: "I can't control the situation. Where do I still have a choice?" Narrowing your focus to what you can influence isn't giving up on the bigger picture. It's how you stay effective inside it.
Story 3: "I just need to push through."
This is the narrative that gets the most applause and does some of the quietest damage.
High-performing professionals are particularly susceptible to this one. The ability to endure, to keep moving when things are hard, is a genuine strength. It becomes a liability when endurance is the only tool available. When "push through" is the answer to every form of difficulty, it stops being resilience and starts being avoidance with better branding.
Research on resilience consistently points to the same finding: it's not about suppressing signals. It's about processing them. The exhaustion, the doubt, the frustration that shows up in a crisis isn't noise. It's often data about what needs to change, what needs support, or what simply isn't working.
The reframe: "Am I pushing through, or pushing past something I actually need to pay attention to?" One moves you forward. The other just delays the reckoning.
Story 4: "Everyone else seems to be handling this fine."
This one feels like an objective observation. You look around. Your colleagues appear composed. Your peers are posting confidently on LinkedIn. Your manager seems unrattled. Meanwhile you're quietly overwhelmed and concluding that the problem must be you.
Social comparison bias means we consistently measure our internal experience against other people's external performance. In professional environments, composure is often performed. The colleague who looks unshaken in the meeting may be having a very different conversation with herself on the drive home.
This narrative isolates you at precisely the moment when connection would serve you most. Asking for input, naming the difficulty, finding out you're not alone — these are the moves that actually help. And this story makes all of them harder.
The reframe: "What I'm seeing is their performance, not their reality." Then the harder question: "What would I tell a colleague who came to me feeling exactly the way I feel right now?" Most people are far more generous advisors to others than they are to themselves.
Story 5: "Once this is over, I'll figure it out."
This is the most comfortable story on the list, which is exactly what makes it worth examining closely.
Deferral feels responsible in a crisis. Why make big decisions without full information? Why restructure your thinking when the situation is still unfolding? Better to wait for clarity, for calm, for the moment when you can finally think straight.
The flaw in that logic is the assumption that "over" arrives cleanly. In a VUCA world, it often doesn't. One wave of disruption overlaps with the next. Clarity is rarely delivered. It's constructed through small decisions made in the middle of uncertainty. Every week spent waiting is a week of adaptation and momentum that doesn't happen.
There's a version of patience that's wise. This isn't it. This is waiting mode, and it compounds quietly until the gap between where you are and where you need to be becomes very hard to close.
The reframe: "I don't need all the answers right now. What's the one thing I can do today that future me will be grateful for?" One decision. One step. That's how clarity gets built, not found.
The Real Skill: Catching the Story Before It Runs You
None of these narratives are signs of weakness. They're signs of having a brain that works overtime to protect you from uncertainty. The goal isn't to eliminate them. It's to create enough space between the trigger and your response to choose something more useful.
That space between what happens and what you do next is where real leadership lives. It starts with a simple but demanding practice: noticing what story is running before you act on it as if it were fact.
You don't have to have it figured out. You just have to be willing to ask: "Is this true, or is this just what my brain needed to believe right now?"
That question, asked honestly, changes things.
If this resonated, you'll want to be on our list. We send practical tools, frameworks, and insights for navigating VUCA with more clarity and less noise — straight to your inbox. Click this link https://kajabi.mindset-wizardry.com/contact-form to join our free mailing list.